- Books

Other Minds: Critical Essays, 1969-1994

Other Minds Critical Essays Over the past twenty five years Thomas Nagel has played a major role in the philosophico biological debate on subjectivity and consciousness This extensive collection of published essays and reviews

  • Title: Other Minds: Critical Essays, 1969-1994
  • Author: Thomas Nagel
  • ISBN: 9780195132465
  • Page: 195
  • Format: Paperback
  • Over the past twenty five years, Thomas Nagel has played a major role in the philosophico biological debate on subjectivity and consciousness This extensive collection of published essays and reviews offers Nagel s opinionated views on the philosophy of mind, epistemology, and political philosophy, as well as on fellow philosophers like Freud, Wittgenstein, Rawls, Dennet,Over the past twenty five years, Thomas Nagel has played a major role in the philosophico biological debate on subjectivity and consciousness This extensive collection of published essays and reviews offers Nagel s opinionated views on the philosophy of mind, epistemology, and political philosophy, as well as on fellow philosophers like Freud, Wittgenstein, Rawls, Dennet, Chomsky, Searle, Nozick, Dworkin, and MacIntyre.

    • Best Read [Thomas Nagel] ☆ Other Minds: Critical Essays, 1969-1994 || [Religion Book] PDF ↠
      195 Thomas Nagel
    • thumbnail Title: Best Read [Thomas Nagel] ☆ Other Minds: Critical Essays, 1969-1994 || [Religion Book] PDF ↠
      Posted by:Thomas Nagel
      Published :2018-09-10T10:36:51+00:00

    1 thought on “Other Minds: Critical Essays, 1969-1994

    1. This collection of essays is split into two halves, the first is reactions to what other people have said about the mind, and the second are reactions to what people have said about ethics. Mostly these are book reviews, and they are all very surgical in their dissection of where other philosophers are wrong. This makes for some pretty interesting reading, but I might have enjoyed the book more if I was better versed in the analytical tradition; instead I had very little first hand knowledge of [...]

    2. Not as good as I hoped. I liked his discussions on Searle, Nozick and Williams. I also had to skip pages due to boredom. I suppose that this is the flaw of a book that doesn't advance a particular argument, and consists of essays about the ideas of other people. If you're not interested in the ideas of those other people, then there's not much to see here.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *